Support ESC Insight on Patreon

The National Finals That Got It Right For Copenhagen Written by on May 14, 2014 | 7 Comments

With close to 10,000 songs submitted across the European broadcasters, there’s a lot of scope to pick the wrong song for your country’s Eurovision Song Contest entry. That doesn’t mean it’s impossible to get it right. Through the National Finals this year, a number of countries managed to get the perfect song to Copenhagen for the Contest.

Who got it right when they were selecting a song via public vote? Let’s start the debate and find out.

Finland were right to send Softengine

Lordi aside, Softengine’s eleventh place is the best Finnish result since Anneli Saaristo’s seventh place in 1989, and the two ninth place finishes in 1984 and 1985. Looking at the scoreboard it’s clear that the track was ‘Something Better‘.

More importantly, Softengine’s success at Eurovision, and in the domestic music market, has handed the National Final format of UMK a much needed win at Eurovision, and a win with Softengine now signed up to Sony Records and the second single ready to go – in fact you heard it at the EuroClub’s Nordic Party this year.

Spain were right to send Ruth Lorenzo

The return to a multi-artist National Final in Spain threw up a tie-breaker result between ‘Dancing In The Rain‘ by Ruth Lorenz, and ‘Mas‘ by Brequette.

Perhaps the hardcore Eurovision fan base had been listening to the studio version of Brequette’s song, because it did lose a little bit when performed live, while Lorenzo found another gear (marked ‘be careful to not go over the top’). The tie-break rules handed priority to the winner of the public vote, and ‘The Rain‘ was heading to Copenhagen.

Spain reached the Top Ten, it was the top country of the Big Five (the UK was second, in seventeenth place), and Lorenzo matched the tenth place of Pastora Soler. While part of me wishes there had been a way to send Lorenzo with ‘Mas‘, she was a wonderful ambassador, a classy stage show…and she literally blew out the speaker in the press room on Saturday night on the high note.

Hungary were right to send András Kállay-Saunders

Personal views on the subject matter aside, ‘Running‘ stormed A Dal, topping the jury vote and then winning the SMS based runoff with the public. Fast and energetic, bringing a solid drum and bass entry to the Eurovision stage, András was as easy on the eye as he was on the ear.

Hungary certainly benefited from the producer-led running order (singing last in the Semi-Finals, and at the tail end of the golden zone of 18-21 in the Grand Final) but the song deserved this. Fifth place is the best result for the country since the fourth place on their full debut in 1994.

Switzerland were right to send Sebalter

Thirteenth place might not trouble the top of the table, but for Switzerland (like many countries) simply being present on Saturday night was the prize. Reaching the left hand side of the table and beating half of the songs in the Grand Final is just icing on the cake.

It’s a win for Sebalter, who spun his own career out of a regionally-succesful band to launch himself. The Swiss Final in 2014 had slim pickings, and it wasn’t clear that ‘Hunter of Stars‘ was the best of the bunch. Once Sebalter’s rehearsal showed a huge improvement in his diction, the momentum started to build up to what should be regarded as a win.

It’s also a win for the Italian broadcaster in Switzerland. RSI have now provided the winning song for the Swiss in two of the last three years.

Latvia were (probably) right to send Aarzemnieki

This is only a probably, because there is a question mark over how well Dons would have done in the Tuesday night Semi-Final. He would have been in direct contrast to Aram MP3, Andras Kallay-Saunders, Sergej Cetkovic, and arguably judged alongside Axel Hirsoux. Would another male chanson have made it through? Probably not.

And if the Suzy Shake couldn’t qualify, there’s no way that Samanta Tina’s sub-schlager-‘Stay’ would have done any better.

That said, Aarzemnieki delivered Latvia their best result in the Eurovision Semi Finals since ‘Wolves of the Sea‘. Unfortunately it wasn’t enough to make it to Saturday (although congrats to Jöran and Katrina for sticking around with the circus till Sunday morning), but I’m struggling to justify any other Dziesma contestant doing better…

Sweden were (probably) right to send Sanna

Third place, lifting the curse of last year’s host, and Sanna Nielsen not only reaching her goal of the Eurovision stage but doing so with style, grace, and a potential Top 20…yet only a probably?

Yes, because while Nielsen delivered a result that Sweden should be proud of, it was your typically clinical and well-produced slice of SVT that the hardcore fans lapped up and ensured it did well in every poll and survey there was… but there was a bigger prize on the table. Given the number of songs from other countries that were contemporary, I will always question Sweden’s emotional response of sending ‘Undo My Sad‘ instead of taking a chance with ‘Busy Doing Nothing‘ and turning it into a summer club hit.

We’ll be following up our look at the National Final Winners with our thoughts on the National Finals that didn’t rise to the occasion and sent the wrong songs to the Copenhagen Contest (and that post is live now, read it here). In the meantime, who got it right for you this year?

About The Author: Ewan Spence

British Academy (BAFTA) nominated broadcaster and writer Ewan Spence is the voice behind The Unofficial Eurovision Song Contest Podcast and one of the driving forces behind ESC Insight. Having had an online presence since 1994, he is a noted commentator around the intersection of the media, internet, technology, mobility and how it affects us all. Based in Edinburgh, Scotland, his work has appeared on the BBC, The Stage, STV, and The Times. You can follow Ewan on Twitter (@ewan) and Facebook (facebook.com/ewanspence).

Read more from this author...

You Can Support ESC Insight on Patreon

ESC Insight's Patreon page is now live; click here to see what it's all about, and how you can get involved and directly support our coverage of your Eurovision Song Contest.

Have Your Say

7 responses to “The National Finals That Got It Right For Copenhagen”

  1. Alex C says:

    I aggree with all of these, especially Sweden. Ace Wilder really would’ve struggled to replicate the ‘work work work’ hook “work” (pardon the pun) without the backing vocals on tape or losing some of the dancers.

  2. Jaz says:

    I take great pleasure in you admitting that Sweden made the right choice…even if it comes with a “probably”!
    I agree with you on all counts, although I think a few of these countries could have done just as well with others from their respective finals. Switzerland, as usual, picked the best of a bad bunch, but Hungary’s A Dal was so strong this year I think more than one of the finalists could have been up at or near Andras’ level on the scoreboard. I also like to think that Finland could have succeeded to a Softengine extent with ‘Sängyn Reunalla’, but I am still spellbound by that song, so there’s bias creeping in there, I’m sure.
    Looking forward to your post on the NFs that didn’t get it right!! I have quite a few personal picks for that too. One in particular will irritate me for the rest of eternity. CoughEstoniacough.

  3. Kai says:

    I Think, Sanna was the best choice. Ace Wilders Vocal Performance was very low… The song was modern and very good, but she was only average in my opinion

  4. Ewan Spence says:

    I think I always made it clear that I know my Ace/Sanna love was going to be contentious! Still stand by it.

  5. Robyn says:

    I’m particularly impressed with Switzerland’s effort. I wasn’t a fan of the song when I first heard it at the national final, but the new version hooked me instantly and became one of my favourite songs of the year.

    It’s good when a song is given the opportunity to improve from selection to Eurovision itself. The Finland process is particularly good like that.

    I look forward to the second part! #lithuania

  6. BBAnne says:

    As much as I love Aarzemnieki (and I really do!) I still think Dons could have got the qualifier for Latvia. I just think that the clarity of Dons voice and the sweeping majesty of Pēdējā vēstule as a song would have been a welcome addition to the semi final – wouldn’t necessarily have been singing 2nd behind Aram mp3 either.

    I’m a bit biased though as Dziesma was my absolute favourite of the National Finals this year, so many good songs (and so many badly performed – yes, I’m looking at you Katrine!) and if Latvia do decide to say Ej tu nost to Eurovision, then I for one will be very, very sad indeed

Leave a Reply