ESC Insight Reader Survey

Pleasefill in our Reader Survey for 2026, we want to know what you think of ESC Insight.

Semifinal Two Post-Mortem Written by on May 8, 2014 | 8 Comments

The history books have closed on this year’s Eurovision Semifinals, and we’ve got our line-up for Saturday Night.

The Winners are:

Austria, Belarus, Finland, Greece, Malta, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, and Switzerland.

And the Draw:

First Half: Austria, Belarus, Greece, Norway, Poland, Romania

Second Half: Finland, Malta, Slovenia, Switzerland

The official running order will be announced a few hours after the Winner’s Press Conference.  Here are a few of the other observations noted by the ESC Insight crew tonight during the Second Semifinal:

The Winners were Somewhat Evenly Split Among the Running Order

In a 15-song contest, four songs came from the first 7 while six came from the back 8.

Upbeat and Midtempo Songs Rule

Seven of tonight’s winners could be considered upbeat (Belarus, Finland, Greece, Malta, Poland, Romania, and Switzerland), while only three tended towards a slower tempo (Austria, Norway, and Slovenia). The remaining songs were primarily uptempo.

The 100% Qualifiers continue their Streak

Romania and Greece, the only nations in this semifinal with a flawless qualification record, will continue their streaks for another year.

About The Author: Samantha Ross

Vaguely aware of the Contest since childhood, a fanatic since 2008, and an ESC blogger since 2009, Samantha Ross made her first sojourn to Eurovision in 2011 and has never looked back. Reporting for ESC Insight and 12 Points From America (https://12pointsfromamerica.com/), her work has featured on BBC World News, SVT, LBC Radio, and many others.

Read more from this author...

You Can Support ESC Insight on Patreon

ESC Insight's Patreon page is now live; click here to see what it's all about, and how you can get involved and directly support our coverage of your Eurovision Song Contest.

ESC Insight No Longer Accepts Comments

Due to the lack of guidance from UK Regulator OFCOM regarding the assessment and impact of the Online Safety Act, ESC Insight will no longer be accepting comments or interactions through the website. Feel free to join the discussions elsewhere you'll find us at Bluesky @escinsight.com or get in touch directly with the team.

Have Your Say

8 responses to “Semifinal Two Post-Mortem”

  1. Peter says:

    I’m so upset for Israel at the moment. Mei was stunning on stage and totally deserved to qualify. 🙁

    And I have no idea how Romania got through. That was an absolutely shocking mess of a performance, yet people still voted for it?

  2. Israel was my shock non-qualifier this time – I picked 9 out of 10 though!

  3. Harriet Krohn says:

    It was a surprise to see Israel not qualify, but I actually think it was deserved. I was not impressed with the performance at all, and the singing seemed too deep for me. I don’t know if it was supposed to sound like this, but it didn’t sound good to me.

    I got 8/10, which is better than my first semi picks (only 7/10). But I’m never really good at the prediction game. 😉

  4. Mark Butler says:

    Peter, I’m sorry to say that the draw answers both your questions. Second spot is never good, last always is. The EBU need to to more to iron out the advantages and disadvantages of the running order. Easier said than done I know.

  5. Zolan says:

    I listened to the lovely Hersi, noted Sam’s (lexically ordered) example, reviewed the performances, and hashed out every consideration I could think of.

    I think the underdogs worked out as they should have, but that it was very close at the cutoff.

  6. Peter says:

    @Mark:
    I agree, 2nd was never going to work against Israel, especially being stuck between Malta and Norway! A place in the last 4 in the running order instead of Slovenia or Romania would have been ideal. Ah well. It wouldn’t be Eurovision without all the what ifs, buts and maybes!

    But as you say, fixing the running order problems is always going to be difficult, and would require a strong leader to identify and push those changes through, someone who isn’t going to bend over backwards to accommodate Christer, someone who isn’t happy to let the broadcasters and delegations degrade the contest on a whim…

  7. Chig says:

    @Peter

    Do you think that DR has bent over backwards to accommodate Christer now? (It’s not an image I want to think about for too long!) They’ve put Sweden after a break, if today’s first rehearsal is an accurate template for tomorrow.

  8. Harriet Krohn says:

    The EBU bent over backwards to accomodate Christer Björkman last year, letting him (or officially SVT) decide the running order himself. DR are just using the possibilities someone else has given them – Björkman was the one who got what he wanted. If it backfires on Sweden a little now … tough luck.